COMMENSAL ISSUE 102


The Newsletter of the Philosophical Discussion Group
Of British Mensa

Number 102 : August 2000
13th August 2000 Theo Todman

EDITORIAL

First of all, apologies for the non-appearance of the June issue of Commensal. I was just too stressed out at work (for no good reason really) to focus on it. Still, we have a bumper issue this time, and on the presumption that the contributions keep rolling in, I hope normal service will be resumed from now on !

  1. New Members
  2. Obituary - Sheila Blanchard
  3. PDG Conference 2000
  4. Mensa At Braziers, October 2000
  5. PDGList
  6. Philosophy for All - PFA
  7. Royal Institute of Philosophy
  8. My Web Page
  9. Date of Next Issue (Commensal 103)

As usual, we welcome new members :-

Sattam Al-Mugheiry

Gordon Shiach

Edward Szwedowski

Peter Baker

Imogen Short

Timothy Christie

Karen Wells

Tim Clemson

Stephen Coomber

 



Obituary - Sheila Blanchard

I received the following note on 8th August from John Logan :-

"I wonder, Theo, if you have heard yet that Sheila died on Saturday. John Paines posted the news to the two Tribune e-lists.

I knew her as our SIGSec in the late 1970s and when I was SIGs Officer from 1982 for a few years, when she gave me much help and encouragement in stabilising the SIGs scene which was rather turbulent at the time.

No doubt other older members of PDG will have known Sheila better than I did and will regret the loss of this wonderful lady."

And later ...

"The funeral was a humanist service on Monday 14th August at Doncaster crematorium. I understand that Stevie Hobbs will be sending an obituary to Mensa Magazine"

This is a great shame. I had a fairly extensive correspondence with Sheila between June '97 & August '98, some of which appeared in Commensal - though her account of the situation that sparked the genesis of PDG & the demise of Mens Sana didn't. It all sounded rather political, the sort of thing I wanted to steer clear of. Besides, I think she told me "for information only".

For some reason Sheila left PDG in late 1998 - her last letter to me of 21st August 1998 indicated she might not renew her subs - she seemed disturbed by the politics (again).

I don't know enough about Sheila's life to comment sensibly, but her intelligence and graciousness shone through in all the correspondence I had with her. Maybe others will have more to add ?




PDG Conference 2000

As announced last time, Roger Farnworth kindly convened the 2nd annual PDG conference at Braziers Park. It took place from Friday 5th - Sunday 7th May 2000. It was, I believe, a great success. Numbers were down on last year - partly because I was rather late advertising the event, and partly due to some late cancellations. As it was, there were 13 of us who took part in the discussions - an inauspicious number, but one ideally conducive to the highly participatory form of the weekend.

We commenced on the Friday night an hour ahead of schedule due to a change in the meal-times at Braziers (Jane Benn - please check for October !). As is usual, we introduced ourselves "in the round". Those present and introducing themselves were, in sequence, Hazel Guest, Roger Farnworth, George Childs, Alan Edmonds, Sheila Haddow, Don Grace (from Florence Alabama), Nigel Perks, Jonathan Young, Linda Gough, Leslie Haddow, John Fender ... and myself. Don's family (wife, son, daughter) also stayed at Braziers though didn't attend the conference sessions. Nevertheless, it was good to meet them at mealtimes & sundry other informal occasions. Frank Luger didn't arrive until midnight because, having survived an endless coach journey from Budapest, he was diverted by rail on the last leg of his journey to Goring-on-Sea rather than the lesser known but more appropriately located Goring near Reading.

These important preliminaries out of the way, Friday's activities continued as advertised with me reading my revised paper Violation of Integrity - A Reprise. I was quite satisfied with the paper (NOTE : This paper, together with all but one of the others presented at Braziers, is produced later in this issue of Commensal. Where this is the case, I have restrained myself from commenting further in this editorial (or, sadly, elsewhere - lack of time & space), but it was not suitable for me, at least, to deliver. I've seen accomplished speakers read difficult papers and make them sound lucid and interesting - this was true even of most of the papers delivered at Braziers - but I just haven't got the knack. I lose my place, get confused, mumble ... especially when interrupted every 30 seconds as tended to be the case. Still, we had a good discussion after I'd given up delivering the paper in the way intended and it did raise many of the issues to be covered throughout the weekend. So, I dare say it wasn't that bad.

Roger Farnworth and then Leslie Haddow got us off to a good start on Saturday morning with papers entitled "What is Man for ?" and "What are People for ?", delivered with appropriate clarity and gusto.

In default of anyone else volunteering to take my place, I spoke in defence of consequentialism as an ethical principle, alloyed to my other prejudices. This seemed to work better than that the effort the previous evening and amply rewarded the half-hour spent in preparation on the Friday morning. There is no justice.

The bulk of Saturday afternoon was taken up with enjoying the sunshine (some of the talks had been al fresco) and the beautiful countryside around the Braziers estate. We then reconvened before tea to hear Frank Luger give us an update on his researches on "Anthropocentrism vs. Cosmocentrism: Groping toward a Paradigm Shift".

The Saturday evening was taken up with an informal session where all sorts of things that I cannot now recall, except the backbone of the session was, at Leslie's instigation, an enjoyable philosophical parlour-game whereby we each had to state in fifty words or less what we thought the meaning or purpose of life was, or else state why we thought this a meaningless question. I no longer have access to these priceless slips of paper, which were read out to the group (with various degrees of accuracy) and then discussed. A model answer by yours truly was :-

"It is not clear that life has a meaning or a purpose. This would require some purposive scheme (eg. a theistic one") into which we fit. We may be given a purpose, eg. by our parents or society, but these are illusory and lead to rebellion as they reflect other people's purposes for us. We may give ourselves a purpose. It is best for this to fit with our natural talents and propensities and has something to do with us fulfilling our potential - that is, our potential to make some positive contribution to the world. We should choose some useful, satisfying and achievable projects and complete them.

Why is this question asked ? All human artefacts are made "for" something, and we have a tendency to assume that all things, including ourselves, are artefacts and must therefore have some purpose. This is a category mistake. Also, we have an emotional need to justify to ourselves that toil is "worth it". Even the projects we enjoy run into difficulties and we psychologically need to persuade ourselves that we're fulfilling a purpose in order to keep going during the difficult times. Some people's lives are all hard times".

Note the scrupulous adherence to the fifty-word limit. Maybe Commensal readers would like to write in with their answers to this tricky question (with a similar or greater license as to length) ?

On Sunday, Alan Edmonds provided us with his reminiscences of Mensa and the political orientation of various prominent individuals linked to his thoughts on the Hi-Q controversy. John Fender concluded the weekend’s presentations with a most stimulating talk on "Freedom, Information & Utilitarianism", the transcript of which is promised for the next Commensal.

The final item on the agenda was the discussion of next year's conference. All had enjoyed the weekend, but it was agreed that we should commence the organisation of the 2001 "Weekend" much earlier than had been the case for 2000. The topic was agreed to be something to do with Consciousness. See next Commensal !



MENSA AT BRAZIERS OCTOBER 2000

I'm grateful to Jane Benn for the following announcement :-

"I enclose a copy of the programme for the Mensa Aims of Education conference at Braziers on 6 - 8 October. I would be grateful is you would publish it in Commensal. Any chance of seeing you in October ? Of course, any member of the Philosophy SIG is more than welcome attend."

THE 100th MENSA INFORMAL RESIDENTIAL DISCUSSION CONFERENCE

Braziers Adult College, Braziers Park, Ipsden, Wallingford OX10 6AN

THE AIMS OF EDUCATION

Chairman: Jane Benn

6th - 8th October 2000

Friday

6th October 2000

19:45

Supper

20:45

Introductory Session - including initial thoughts on what we individually believe to be the main aims of education; delegates are invited to bring their own one-sentence definition.

22:00

Refreshments

   

Saturday

7th October 2000

08:30

Breakfast

09:30

Alan Hassell What the well-educated adult should know?

11:00

Coffee

11:30

Leslie Haddow The various aims of education and the compromises necessary between them.

13:00

Lunch

Afternoon

Free

16:15

Tea

16:45

John Maxwell Student-centred education.

18:00

Sheila Haddow Motivating the individual.

19:00

Supper

20:00

Interlude - Delegates are invited to entertain and educate us with a favourite piece of poetry, literature or music (cl0 minutes maximum); musical delegates are invited to make use of the good piano available, or bring their own instrument. And those who believe that a glass or two of wine would add to the enjoyment are invited to bring an appropriate bottle.

   

Sunday

8th October 2000

08:30

Breakfast

09:30

Jenny Turner The relative merits of the Internet, CD-Roms, and books in education.

11:00

Coffee

11:30

Pam Ford Proposals to bring more intellectual content into Mensa activities.

12:00

Final Discussion and Plans for Future Conferences

13:00

Lunch

NOTE

There will be ample opportunity for general discussion after each presentation. Speakers have been asked to restrict their contributions to a maximum of 45 minutes, and most have indicated that they will in fact be speaking for a considerably shorter time.




PDGList

This is the internet discussion group of PDG and invited guests. To join PDGList you need first of all to log on to http://www.egroups.com and sign up to eGroups. Then you need to apply to join PDGList itself. You can do this by initially doing a search on "pdglist" and then following instructions. Alternatively, and quicker (though you will thereby miss out on all the wonders of eGroups !), you can go directly to http://www.egroups.com/group/pdglist - again, you will need to join eGroups first (it will prompt you) - and then click on the "subscribe" link or button. Either way, I then need to accept your application. Once accepted, whenever anyone posts anything to the list, you will automatically receive an emailed copy of the posting. To post something yourself, just email to pdglist@egroups.com and everyone on the list will receive a copy. Why not give it a go ?

Incidentally, for those who've signed up for PDGList, MS Word 97 versions of all the back-issues of Commensal since I've been PDG Secretary are available in the "Files" area at the PDGList website (http://www.egroups.com/group/pdglist).



PHILOSOPHY FOR ALL - PFA

NOTE : PFA has no relationship with PDG or British Mensa. See C100 (or http://www.pfalondon.freeserve.co.uk) for more details on PFA.

Kant's Cave : On every first Wednesday of the month, from 7pm (lecture at 7.30 pm) PHILOSOPHY FOR ALL meets at "Kant's Cave" for a lecture, debate and social evening. Kant's Cave meetings are now held at the cellar bar of The Penderel’s Oak, 283-288 High Holborn, London (3 mins walk from Holborn tube station). Door-charge: £1 (free for PFA members)

UPCOMING KANT'S CAVE LECTURES

6 Sept 2000

Robert Johnson : In search of the Essence

4 Oct 2000

Dr. Barry C. Smith (Birkbeck College, London) : tba

1 Nov 2000

tba

6 Dec 2000

Dr. Veronique Monoz-Darde (University College, London) : tbc

3 Jan 2001

tba

7 Feb 2001

Dr. Eric Frankel and Dr. Stephen Szanto (Whipps Hospital London) : Brainwashed Youth - A Neuroscientific and Philosophical Appraisal

The PFA at the Mary Ward Centre : Philosophy Debates are to be held approx. monthly on Saturdays 14:00 - 17:00; Dates : 14 October, 2 December, 16 December, 17 February, 3 March, 7 April, 19 May, 2 June, 9 June. There are also Public Lectures on some Saturdays 10:00 - 13:00; Dates : 28 October & 7 April. The Mary Ward Centre is at 42 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AQ. There is no fee.



ROYAL INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY

Annual Lecture Series, 2000-2001 : Logic, Thought and Language

NOTE : The RIP has no connection to PDG or Mensa, but I can very highly recommend these lectures.

2000

 

13 October

Mark Sainsbury.
What Logic Should We Think With?

20 October

Gregory McCulloch.
Mental Representation

27 October

Julia Tanney.
Self-Knowledge, Normativity, and Construction

3 November

Barry Smith.
Thought and Language

10 November

Alan Millar.
The Normativity of Intention and Meaning

17 November

Gabriel Segal.
tba

24 November

David Wiggins.
tba

1 December

Crispin Wright.
Relativism and Classical Logic

8 December

Jennifer Hornsby.
Communication

2001

 

19 January

Christopher Peacocke.
tba

26 January

M. G. F. Martin.
Language

2 February

A. W. Moore.
What Are These familiar Words Doing Here?

9 February

Scott Surgeon.
The Conditionality of Thought

16 February

Timothy Williamson.
Possible Beings

23 February

S. G. Williams.
Ambiguity

2 March

Bob Hale.
Logical Knowledge

9 March

Charles Travis.
Rethinking Psychologism

16 March

Paul Boghossian.
Rational Belief

All Lectures to be given at 14 Gordon Square, London WC1 on Fridays at 5.45 pm. Admission is free.


My Web Page

Please excuse the self-advertisement, but ... I've at last got round to setting up my web-site (http://www.kenrick-todman.freeserve.co.uk). Amateurish stuff, but has links to HTML versions of two sets of documents I've produced over the years.

1. The pompously entitled Tractatus Christianus - a (fairly negative but not mocking) appraisal of Christianity which gives my general worldview in order to be able to undertake the critique. A long document in the style of Ludwig Wittgenstein. My magnum opus.

2. Back issues of Commensal - it only contains 3 rather old issues at the moment, but I'll add more as I get round to the tedious task of conversion. The advantage (I allege !) of the HTML versions is that they allow you to hop around between articles (useful for understanding the mixed-bag commentaries on previous issues).


Next Issue of Commensal

The next edition of Commensal (C103) will appear in October. The closing date will be 22nd September 2000.

Best wishes !


Theo



Previous Editorial (in Commensal 101)
Current Editorial (top) (Commensal 102)
Next Article in Current Issue (Commensal 102)
Index to Current Issue (Commensal 102)