Theo Todman's Web Page - Notes Pages
Bible
Bible – Pluses and Minuses
(Text as at 24/06/2014 09:25:55)
*** THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS NOTE ***
(For the live version and other versions of this Note, see the tables at the end)
- In contrast with most Christians1, I have actually read2 the whole Bible through a few times, some passages hundreds of times. However, when my Christian faith unravelled in the early 1990s I stopped reading the Bible, and now have some difficulty remembering the Chapters and Verses.
- What I have attempted – and achieved – over the past year (2013) is to read the Bible through again with fresh eyes. This time "Bible - The Bible in One Year: New International Version". In general, the Bible is a ripping good read, and deserves to be more widely read as literature.
- What I had intended – but not achieved – was to jot down all the things that are troublesome, without ignoring the passages that impress. Maybe someone has answers to the difficulties (though I doubt it).
- So, having re-read the entire Bible to remind myself of what’s there, I intend to go through it all again, but this time with some heavy-duty “Introductions” as guides to (fairly) current opinion, from the perspectives of Liberal and Conservative Christian scholars, and likewise for Jews. Items on the agenda3:-
- Incidentally, I don’t have a huge amount of time for this exercise, and I won’t be writing a Bible commentary, or even reading any of them.
- The idea is to plough on to complete this part of the exercise in three10 years. No doubt my jottings will be superficial. But something’s better than nothing. I have a feeling that there are lots of “problems” with the Bible, but I need to make plain what these are.
- There follows a list of all the books in the Bible. Clicking on the links will reveal what I have to say, which in most cases is nothing. In the first instance I’ve just taken the (very brief) summaries from "Bible - The Bible in One Year: New International Version" and occasionally added a comment.
- I need to develop a method11 whereby the “Pluses and Minuses” are readily visible, rather than hidden away in a straggle of text. Anyway, here goes.
Old Testament
- Genesis12
- Exodus13
- Leviticus14
- Numbers15
- Deuteronomy16
- Joshua17
- Judges18
- Ruth19
- 1 Samuel20
- 2 Samuel21
- 1 Kings22
- 2 Kings23
- 1 Chronicles24
- 2 Chronicles25
- Ezra26
- Nehemiah27
- Esther28
- Psalms29
- Proverbs30
- Job31
- Ecclesiastes32
- Song of Songs33
- Isaiah34
- Jeremiah35
- Lamentations36
- Ezekiel37
- Daniel38
- Hosea39
- Joel40
- Amos41
- Obadiah42
- Jonah43
- Micah44
- Nahum45
- Habakkuk46
- Zephaniah47
- Haggai48
- Zechariah49
- Malachi50
New Testament
- Matthew51
- Mark52
- Luke53
- John54
- Acts55
- Romans56
- 1 Corinthians57
- 2 Corinthians58
- Galatians59
- Ephesians60
- Philippians61
- Colossians62
- 1 Thessalonians63
- 2 Thessalonians64
- 1 Timothy65
- 2 Timothy66
- Titus67
- Philemon68
- Hebrews69
- James70
- 1 Peter71
- 2 Peter72
- 1 John73
- 2 John74
- 3 John75
- Jude76
- Revelation77
In-Page Footnotes
Footnote 1: With some regret, I don’t think I can count myself any longer as a Christian. Click here for Note for a discussion with a friend back in 2007 which explains my reasons in some detail.
Footnote 3: This is rather a lot. We’ll see how we progress.
Footnote 4: This is the text I’ve just read (in 2013). I won’t read it through again this time round, but will use it and the notes to supply a conservative Christian perspective on passages of disputed interpretation.
Footnote 5: This is described as for those Jews of the “Conservative, Reformed or Reconstructionist” persuasions. According to the Publisher’s blurb, “Orthodox” Jews also were involved in the translation of the Text, which is the one I shall read as my primary text for the OT. So, presumably, there’s a distinction between “Conservative” and “Orthodox” Jews. Currently, I’ve no idea what Reconstructionist Jews believe, but will no doubt find out.
Footnotes 6, 8: Nothing to say, yet. I’ve had this book some time, and have not looked at it much. It seems rather dull.
Footnote 7: Very liberal, in fact, and less scholarly than many (though far from “popular”). But opinionated and stimulating.
Footnote 9: Maybe oddly, this will be my primary text for reading the New Testament.
Footnote 10: I originally thought “two years”, but it won’t be enough. I’ll need some sort of plan to achieve even this, but given my propensity to produce elaborate plans that lead nowhere, I’ll skip the plan until I’ve got some momentum together.
Footnote 11: It’ll no doubt be possible, but this is another task awaiting sufficient “momentum” to be worthwhile.
Live Version of this Archived Note
Earlier Version of this Note
| This version updated |
Reading List for this Topic |
Parent Topic |
| 24/06/2014 09:25:55 |
None available |
None |
Summary of Notes Links from this Page
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).
Summary of Note Links to this Page
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).
Text Colour Conventions
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026