Theo Todman's Web Page - Notes Pages
Personal Identity
Dracula
(Text as at 06/07/2023 00:43:12)
Plug Note1
- Thesis Text:
- Count Dracula is only a Fiction2, but the vicissitudes he is supposed to be able to survive may be worth some brief considerations to determine whether they are metaphysically possible – or even make logical sense.
- I have no great interest in what supposedly causes vampirism – whether it’s a virus or whatever, nor on how it’s passed on. Nor do I care about Dracula’s abilities to climb walls or fly through the air. Nor about his supposed aversion to garlic or crucifixes.
- However, the vampire is supposed to only maintain his Existence3 by drinking blood – preferably human, but animal blood – particularly of rats – will do at a pinch. I presume there’s some refection of ancient ideas that ‘the Life4 – or Soul5 – is in the blood’, which was not to be eaten.
- Dracula is described as ‘undead’. That is – he has died at some point – in fact at many points in later retellings in order to keep the sequels running – but is neither claimed to be alive nor dead. We might reflect on how such an idea squares with our normal ideas of what Life6 and Death7 are.
- The fictional claims that really interest me relate to Dracula’s Metamorphoses8. The first question is what he ‘really’ looks like. In the book, and film thereof, Dracula in has castle looks as you might expect someone over 400 years old to look. But when he appears in public, he looks young and handsome. Then – in the dénouement – when he is mortally wounded in the guise of his ancient self – he reverts to his youthful self in response to Mina’s kiss, after which he is ‘released’ by beheading. A question is – is he metamorphosing, or supposed to be influencing the vision of his beholders? As the latter would be needlessly complicated in busy London streets, I assume the former, especially as he is supposed to transform himself otherwise. Enough to say there’s nothing metaphysically problematical about such identity-preserving Metamorphosis9, as it’s presumably ‘just’ a rearrangement of Matter10, with some need for an energy source to effect the same. One needn’t worry about the details.
- The more interesting metamorphoses involve Dracula’s supposed Metamorphosis11 into a large dog-like animal on leaving the ship at Whitby, and into a mist, into bats, and rats.
- Transformation into a dog (and back) would be a trans-species Metamorphosis12. I’ve not much special to add here. If Dracula still falls under the Natural Kind13 concept Human Being14, and the natural kind is an essential property of the Individual15, then he would cease to exist as the dog, but – if Intermittent Existence16 is allowed – might subsequently ‘exist again’. The same might apply to the other transformations.
- It is supposed that Dracula transforms himself into many bats (or rats). Bats and rats are much of a muchness. The interesting common feature is the one-to-many ratio. If Dracula cannot survive – logically speaking – Metamorphosis17 into a dog, he certainly can’t survive transformation into a single rat or bat, let alone many of them. Each rat – we may suppose – is an independent sentient being. Can they collectively constitute another being? Would this ‘distributed’ being be an Individual18? Are we to suppose Dracula to be conscious in this state? It is true that Organisms19 are constituted by a multitude of cells, but these cells aren’t independent beings. More could be said – maybe along the lines of Societies20.
- Transformation into a mist is very odd. Presumably this is disassembly into microscopic constituent parts. Can an Organism21 – as distinct from a bicycle – survive such an adventure? "Olson (Eric) - Life After Death and the Devastation of the Grave" thinks not. Would he cease to exist in the interim or exist as a Scattered Object22?
- It’s not in the book, but – at least in Hammer Horror – human blood dropped onto his ashes allows Dracula to regenerate. This would seem to be an example of Resurrection23. At least there’s some physical Continuity24 mediated by the ashes.
Further Remarks:
- In October 2022, while tossing and turning with Covid in the dead of night, it occurred to me that the fictional Dracula might be a useful case study for various issues in the general area of Personal Identity. This Note is the end result.
- While Dracula25 is today a Fictional26 character, there is of course a historical antecedent in Vlad the Impaler27. I have no professional interest in the historical facts, however.
- My considerations include not only the inventions of Bram Stoker but also the later additions of Hammer Horror28, and others29.
- As is apparent from the above, this Note relates to – and could be subordinated under – numerous others, including:-
- Unsurprisingly, I had nothing philosophical on this topic when I first considered it. Even a trawl of JSTOR revealed nothing to add to the empty lists below. There was lots on the history, politics, sociology and sexuality of Dracula, but nothing I could see that discussed the Metaphysics. There is a Cambridge Companion to Dracula which I have access to via Cambridge Core35 but this has little of interest to me.
References
In-Page Footnotes:
Footnote 25: Footnote 27: Footnote 28: Footnote 29: Footnote 35:
Previous Version of this Note:
| Date |
Length |
Title |
| 10/10/2022 22:32:10 |
6839 |
Dracula |
| Note last updated |
Reading List for this Topic |
Parent Topic |
| 06/07/2023 00:43:12 |
None available |
Thought Experiments |
Summary of Notes Referenced by This Note
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above.
Summary of Notes Citing This Note
| PID Note, Book & Paper Usage, 2, 3 |
Thesis - Chapter 10 (Thought Experiments), 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Thesis - Personal Identity, 2 |
Website Generator Documentation - Functors, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
|
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above.
Authors, Books & Papers Citing this Note
| Author |
Title |
Medium |
Extra Links |
Read? |
| Gale (Richard) |
On Some Pernicious Thought-Experiments |
Paper  |
|
Yes |
| Todman (Theo) |
Thesis - Chapter 10 (Thought Experiments) |
Paper  |
2, 3, 4, 5 |
Yes |
| Todman (Theo) |
Thesis - Personal Identity |
Paper  |
2 |
Yes |
| Wilson (Jack) |
Beyond Horses and Oak Trees: A New Theory of Individuation for Living Entities |
Paper  |
|
Yes |
References & Reading List
| Author |
Title |
Medium |
Source |
Read? |
| Martin (L. Michael) & Augustine (Keith) |
The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death |
Book - Cited (via Paper Cited)  |
Bibliographical details to be supplied |
15% |
| Olson (Eric) |
Life After Death and the Devastation of the Grave |
Paper - Cited  |
Martin & Augustine - The Myth of an Afterlife, Part 2, Chapter 19, 2015: 409-423 |
Yes |
| Stoker (Bram) |
Dracula |
Book - Cited  |
Stoker (Bram) - Dracula |
2% |
| Wilson (Jack) |
Beyond Horses and Oak Trees: A New Theory of Individuation for Living Entities |
Paper - Referencing  |
Wilson, Jack - Biological Individuality: The identity and Persistence of Living Entities; 1999, Chap. 1, pp. 1-21 |
Yes |
| Wilson (Jack) |
Biological Individuality - The identity and Persistence of Living Entities |
Book - Referencing (via Paper Referencing)  |
Bibliographical details to be supplied |
Yes |
Text Colour Conventions
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026