Theo Todman's Web Page - Notes Pages


Personal Identity

Fission

(Text as at 12/08/2007 10:17:46)

*** THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS NOTE ***


(For the live version and other versions of this Note, see the tables at the end)


The paradigm case is of two half-brain1 transplants2. It is difficult to consider these cases without slipping into the “psychological view3”. Each hemisphere seems to preserve what matters4 to the fissioned individual, and a perdurance5 account can maintain identity6 after fission. An alternative account is to claim that the two half-brains always were separate persons (and Puccetti has maintained that they are, in all of us, even prior to the commissurotomy7 in this thought-experiment8), in a way slightly different from the usual Lewis9 view of non-identical spatially coincident10 individuals11 (because the hemispheres aren’t spatially coincident, though the shared body12 is).

We need to consider how the original person13 was unified14. We can press the realism of the thought-experiment by asking how important are the spinal chord and PNS generally to the psychological integrity of the human organism15? Again, the case of dicephalus16 twins may be relevant – where the functions of walking and even typing seem to be carried out perfectly adequately despite the coordinated limbs being controlled by different brains.

We also need to consider whether the two half-brains continue to constitute a single scattered17 person, just parked in separate bodies. A single embodiment is important because it ensures synchronisation of experience, and external communication between the hemispheres. Presumably, this could be achieved in other ways. We can imagine a BIV18 linked by radio transmitters/receivers to a remote body – the brain is part of the body – so a single physical thing can be spatially discontinuous. Why, if A fissions into B and C, can’t we consider B & C to be parts of the same person? They could fight / argue … but so can someone in two minds about things. What if one killed the other? They would have different perceptual experiences, but so (presumably) does a chameleon, with its eyes pointing in different directions (and sheep and other herbivores, and fish, with eyes on the sides of their heads). I need to consider in detail what is supposed to be going on in fission – ie. press the thought experiment: there needs to be segregation / redundancy prior to separation – this can happen over time (or we would have plain duplication19). At some point the person will split, with incommunicable consciousnesses20 (cf. Locke21’s day-person and night-person).



Live Version of this Archived Note

Date Length Title
06/07/2023 00:43:12 6249 Fission


Table of the 8 Later Versions of this Note

Date Length Title
20/09/2022 11:24:00 5987 Fission
12/05/2022 21:27:22 5660 Fission
02/07/2021 20:32:38 5059 Fission
11/02/2021 11:29:46 4715 Fission
25/09/2020 11:08:10 4016 Fission
15/02/2018 20:54:14 5296 Fission
18/12/2010 19:58:05 2605 Fission
26/11/2007 23:25:26 2609 Fission



This version updated Reading List for this Topic Parent Topic
12/08/2007 10:17:46 Fission Thought Experiments



Summary of Notes Links from this Page

Body Brain Brains in Vats Coincident Objects Commissurotomy
Consciousness Dicephalus Duplication Individual Lewis
Locke Logic of Identity Organisms Perdurance vs Endurance Person
Psychological View Scattered Objects Thought Experiments Transplants Unity of the Person
What Matters        

To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).




Summary of Note Links to this Page

Four Dimensionalism Fusion Psychological Continuity - Forward Replication Research - Proposal, 2
Teletransportation Thesis - Outline      

To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).




Text Colour Conventions

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026




© Theo Todman, June 2007 - March 2026.Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com.File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this PageReturn to Theo Todman's Philosophy PageReturn to Theo Todman's Home Page