(Text as at 12/08/2007 10:17:46)*** THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS NOTE ***
The paradigm case is of two half-brain1 transplants2. It is difficult to consider these cases without slipping into the “psychological view3”. Each hemisphere seems to preserve what matters4 to the fissioned individual, and a perdurance5 account can maintain identity6 after fission. An alternative account is to claim that the two half-brains always were separate persons (and Puccetti has maintained that they are, in all of us, even prior to the commissurotomy7 in this thought-experiment8), in a way slightly different from the usual Lewis9 view of non-identical spatially coincident10 individuals11 (because the hemispheres aren’t spatially coincident, though the shared body12 is).
We need to consider how the original person13 was unified14. We can press the realism of the thought-experiment by asking how important are the spinal chord and PNS generally to the psychological integrity of the human organism15? Again, the case of dicephalus16 twins may be relevant – where the functions of walking and even typing seem to be carried out perfectly adequately despite the coordinated limbs being controlled by different brains.
We also need to consider whether the two half-brains continue to constitute a single scattered17 person, just parked in separate bodies. A single embodiment is important because it ensures synchronisation of experience, and external communication between the hemispheres. Presumably, this could be achieved in other ways. We can imagine a BIV18 linked by radio transmitters/receivers to a remote body – the brain is part of the body – so a single physical thing can be spatially discontinuous. Why, if A fissions into B and C, can’t we consider B & C to be parts of the same person? They could fight / argue … but so can someone in two minds about things. What if one killed the other? They would have different perceptual experiences, but so (presumably) does a chameleon, with its eyes pointing in different directions (and sheep and other herbivores, and fish, with eyes on the sides of their heads). I need to consider in detail what is supposed to be going on in fission – ie. press the thought experiment: there needs to be segregation / redundancy prior to separation – this can happen over time (or we would have plain duplication19). At some point the person will split, with incommunicable consciousnesses20 (cf. Locke21’s day-person and night-person).
| Date | Length | Title |
| 06/07/2023 00:43:12 | 6249 | Fission |
| Date | Length | Title |
| 20/09/2022 11:24:00 | 5987 | Fission |
| 12/05/2022 21:27:22 | 5660 | Fission |
| 02/07/2021 20:32:38 | 5059 | Fission |
| 11/02/2021 11:29:46 | 4715 | Fission |
| 25/09/2020 11:08:10 | 4016 | Fission |
| 15/02/2018 20:54:14 | 5296 | Fission |
| 18/12/2010 19:58:05 | 2605 | Fission |
| 26/11/2007 23:25:26 | 2609 | Fission |
| This version updated | Reading List for this Topic | Parent Topic |
|---|---|---|
| 12/08/2007 10:17:46 | Fission | Thought Experiments |
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).
| Four Dimensionalism | Fusion | Psychological Continuity - Forward | Replication | Research - Proposal, 2 |
| Teletransportation | Thesis - Outline |
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).
| © Theo Todman, June 2007 - March 2026. | Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. | File output: Website Maintenance Dashboard | Return to Top of this Page | Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page | Return to Theo Todman's Home Page |