Theo Todman's Web Page - Notes Pages
Personal Identity
Phase Sortals
(Text as at 18/12/2010 19:58:05)
*** THIS IS NOT THE LATEST VERSION OF THIS NOTE ***
(For the live version and other versions of this Note, see the tables at the end)
See under Sortals1 for the introduction of the concept PHASE SORTAL. I seem to have misappropriated the term. In its standard usage (I am told), a phase sortal is a biologically-motivated term. The clearest examples are of individuals that metamorphose2; for example the butterfly: egg to larva (caterpillar) to pupa (chrysalis) to adult (butterfly). The caterpillar is a phase sortal of the organism, with clear spatio-temporal boundaries. My standard example is of CHILD, which is a (vaguely-boundaried) biological phase of the substance sortal HUMAN BEING.
An example of a possible human phase sortal that is a non-person is INFANT. This example might be especially relevant to the topic, because “infant” is derived from the Latin in-fans “without speech”, and the capacity for speech is often claimed to be an essential prerequisite for being a person.
Any suggestion that the concept PERSON is “no more than” a phase sortal of an umbrella concept isn’t intended to imply unimportance. Rather, simply that persons might not belong to kinds3 (and in particular natural4 kinds), nor be substances5, but that personhood might be a property of substances (of animals6, for instance).
What about “periodic” phase sortals such as STUDENT? A human being can “pop in and out of” studenthood by registering or deregistering, but he can’t do this with childhood. Which model suits personhood? See the discussion of intermittent7 objects. However, if the above suggestion that the concept PHASE SORTAL is biologically motivated is correct, a purely social concept such as STUDENT is not a phase sortal in this sense, and PERSON might not be either. I could, of course, invent a new term of art.
All roads seem to lead to Wiggins (Snowdon refers to him a lot in the context of Animalism, though I seem to remember that Olson thinks Wiggins isn’t a true Animalist, but a supporter of the psychological view). I need to read "Wiggins (David) - Sameness and Substance" and "Wiggins (David) - Sameness and Substance Renewed" with some urgency; also, maybe, "Wiggins (David) - Metaphysics: Substance" in "Grayling (Anthony), Ed. - Philosophy 1 - A Guide Through the Subject".
This is mostly a place-holder8. Currently, just see the categorised reading-list (if any).
Live Version of this Archived Note
Table of the 2 Earlier Versions of this Note
Table of the 6 Later Versions of this Note
| This version updated |
Reading List for this Topic |
Parent Topic |
| 18/12/2010 19:58:05 |
Phase Sortals |
Sortals |
Summary of Notes Links from this Page
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).
Summary of Note Links to this Page
| Clinical Observations |
Daniel Dennett – Conditions of Personhood |
Human Beings, 2 |
Intermittent Objects, 2 |
Kinds |
| Metamorphosis |
Personal Identity and Moral Action. T1 |
Psychological Continuity, 2 |
Reductionism, 2 |
Sortals |
| Substance |
Thesis - Chapter 03 (What is a Person?), 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Thesis - Chapter 04 (Basic Metaphysical Issues), 2, 3, 4, 5 |
Thesis - Current Position |
Thesis - Current Stance, 2 |
| Thesis - Outline |
Unity of the Person |
Wiggins |
|
|
To access information, click on one of the links in the table above (if any).
Text Colour Conventions
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026