Butler Scoring - Mountnessing Butler Pairs (16/10/2014)

Event Results: Link

Overall Ranking

Rank	Pair ID	Pair Name	Butler IMPs	X-IMPs	NGS %age
1	7	Roger Bacon & Len Williams	57	56.25	66.57
2	13	Simon Moorman & Peter Oake	38	35.75	59.65
3	8	Catriona Lovett & Mike Harbour	24	23.62	56.96
4	18	David Tennet & Theo Todman	10	12	53.53
5	17	Dorothy Cundy & Chris Rastin	10	6.75	51.99
6	10	Chris Megahey & Alaric Cundy	8	9.5	52.8
7	15	Pamela Kite & Liz Williams	1	-0.88	49.76
8	14	Les Curtis & David Piper	1	2.25	50.61
9	9	Margaret Rastin & Roger Tattersfield	0	0.12	50.04
10	12	Lionel Thacker & James Murray	-1	-2.5	49.32
11	3	Maureen Vede & Lorraine Butler	-5	-7.5	47.79
12	11	Phil Hitchins & Phil Tucker	-8	-1.62	49.52
13	19	Derek Smith & Peter Goodey	-15	-13.12	46.46
14	1	Maureen Robinson & Roger Hayward	-15	-8.25	47.57
15	16	Julie Lake & Gillian Burrows	-15	-15.62	45.78
16	4	Angela West & Bill West	-15	-19.75	44.18
17	6	Sheila Vincent & Nick Hagan	-22	-25.38	42.53
18	5	Jill Tattersfield & Lorna Wells	-25	-25.62	42.45
19	2	Carol McCue & Terry Murphy	-28	-26	42.98

Detailed Analysis

Detail for Pair: Maureen Robinson & Roger Hayward

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
1	1	NS	11	5D+1	N	.	12	420	580	-160	-4	-4	-4
1	2	NS	11	4H-2	S	.	8	-200	40	-240	-6	-6	-7
1	3	NS	10	4S=	S	.	10	420	270	150	4	4	4
1	4	NS	10	2D+1	E	.	9	-110	-100	-10	0	0	0
1	5	NS	2	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-2
1	6	NS	2	2S+1	N	.	9	140	100	40	1	1	2
1	9	NS	19	6NT=	N	.	12	990	460	530	11	11	11	Yes
1	10	NS	19	2H-1	S	.	7	-100	10	-110	-3	-3	-3
1	11	NS	18	5CX-1	S	.	10	-100	-290	190	5	5	4
1	12	NS	18	3C-1	S	.	8	-100	10	-110	-3	-3	-3
1	13	NS	17	6NT-1	N	.	11	-100	-20	-80	-2	-2	-2
1	14	NS	17	4S=	N	.	10	420	310	110	3	3	4
1	15	NS	16	3S=	N	.	9	140	0	140	4	4	4
1	16	NS	16	3H-1	E	.	8	100	-150	250	6	6	6
1	17	NS	15	6H=	E	.	12	-980	-620	-360	-8	-8	-8
1	18	NS	15	2H+1	W	.	9	-140	-120	-20	-1	-1	-1
1	19	NS	14	3C=	S	.	9	110	300	-190	-5	-5	-4
1	20	NS	14	3S+1	E	.	10	-170	50	-220	-6	-6	-4
1	21	EW	13	3D+1	E	.	10	130	120	10	0	0	2
1	22	EW	13	3S-1	E	.	8	-100	60	-160	-4	-4	-3
1	23	EW	12	3H=	W	.	9	140	230	-90	-3	-3	-3
1	24	EW	12	3H=	N	.	9	-140	-110	-30	-1	-1	-1

Detail for Pair: Carol McCue & Terry Murphy

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
2	1	EW	6	3NT+1	N	.	10	-430	-580	150	4	4	4
2	2	EW	6	3NT-2	S	.	7	200	-40	240	6	6	7	Yes
2	3	NS	12	4S-1	S	.	9	-50	270	-320	-8	-8	-7
2	4	NS	12	2NT-4	N	.	4	-400	-100	-300	-7	-7	-8	Yes
2	5	EW	1	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	2
2	6	EW	1	2S+1	N	.	9	-140	-100	-40	-1	-1	-2
2	7	EW	7	4S+1	S	.	11	-650	-660	10	0	0	2
2	8	EW	7	4HX-2	E	.	8	-300	-100	-200	-5	-5	-6	Yes
2	9	EW	18	3NT+2	S	.	11	-460	-460	0	0	0	0
2	10	EW	18	2H+1	N	.	9	-140	-10	-130	-4	-4	-4	Yes
2	11	EW	8	4C=	S	.	10	-130	290	-420	-9	-9	-9	Yes
2	12	EW	8	2H=	N	.	8	-110	-10	-100	-3	-3	-3
2	13	EW	3	6NT-2	N	.	10	200	20	180	5	5	5
2	14	EW	3	4S=	N	.	10	-420	-310	-110	-3	-3	-4	Yes
2	15	EW	9	2S+2	N	.	10	-170	0	-170	-5	-5	-5	Yes
2	16	EW	9	4S-2	N	.	8	100	150	-50	-2	-2	-2
2	17	EW	4	4H+2	E	.	12	480	620	-140	-4	-4	-3
2	18	EW	4	3H-1	W	.	8	-50	120	-170	-5	-5	-5
2	19	EW	11	3NT=	S	.	9	-400	-300	-100	-3	-3	-3
2	20	EW	11	5D-1	N	.	10	100	-50	150	4	4	3
2	21	EW	5	3D=	E	.	9	110	120	-10	0	0	1
2	22	EW	5	4H-4	N	.	6	200	60	140	4	4	4
2	23	NS	19	3H+1	W	.	10	-170	-230	60	2	2	2
2	24	NS	19	2H+3	N	.	11	200	110	90	3	3	3	Yes

Detail for Pair: Maureen Vede & Lorraine Butler

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
3	1	EW	15	6D=	N	.	12	-920	-580	-340	-8	-8	-8
3	2	EW	15	2S+2	S	.	10	-170	-40	-130	-4	-4	-3
3	3	EW	14	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-270	-150	-4	-4	-4
3	4	EW	14	2D=	E	.	8	90	100	-10	0	0	0
3	5	NS	13	3S-1	S	.	8	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-2
3	6	NS	13	1NT=	W	.	7	-90	100	-190	-5	-5	-4
3	7	NS	12	4S+2	N	.	12	680	660	20	1	1	-1
3	8	NS	12	3C+1	S	.	10	130	100	30	1	1	1
3	9	NS	11	3NT+3	N	.	12	490	460	30	1	1	1
3	10	NS	11	2H+1	S	.	9	140	10	130	4	4	4
3	11	NS	10	5CX-1	S	.	10	-100	-290	190	5	5	4
3	12	NS	10	3S-2	W	.	7	100	10	90	3	3	3
3	13	NS	2	6NT-2	N	.	10	-200	-20	-180	-5	-5	-5
3	14	NS	2	4S=	N	.	10	420	310	110	3	3	4	Yes
3	17	NS	19	4H+2	E	.	12	-480	-620	140	4	4	3
3	18	NS	19	2H+2	W	.	10	-170	-120	-50	-2	-2	-2
3	19	NS	18	5C-1	S	.	10	-50	300	-350	-8	-8	-8
3	20	NS	18	4D=	N	.	10	130	50	80	2	2	2
3	21	NS	17	3D+2	W	.	11	-150	-120	-30	-1	-1	-2	Yes
3	22	NS	17	4S-3	E	.	7	300	-60	360	8	8	7
3	23	NS	16	3H=	W	.	9	-140	-230	90	3	3	3
3	24	NS	16	1NT-2	E	.	5	100	110	-10	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Angela West & Bill West

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
4	1	NS	17	3NT+1	N	.	10	430	580	-150	-4	-4	-4
4	2	NS	17	4S-1	S	.	9	-100	40	-140	-4	-4	-4
4	3	EW	16	4D-3	E	.	7	-300	-270	-30	-1	-1	-1
4	4	EW	16	2D=	E	.	8	90	100	-10	0	0	0
4	5	EW	15	4S-2	N	.	8	200	0	200	5	5	5	Yes
4	6	EW	15	3S-1	N	.	8	50	-100	150	4	4	4
4	7	NS	14	6S=	S	.	12	1430	660	770	13	13	13	Yes
4	8	NS	14	5D-3	N	.	8	-150	100	-250	-6	-6	-6	Yes
4	9	NS	13	3NT+2	N	.	11	460	460	0	0	0	0
4	10	NS	13	4H-2	S	.	8	-200	10	-210	-5	-5	-5	Yes
4	11	NS	12	4H=	W	.	10	-420	-290	-130	-4	-4	-4
4	12	NS	12	4H-1	N	.	9	-100	10	-110	-3	-3	-3
4	13	NS	11	6NT-1	S	.	11	-100	-20	-80	-2	-2	-2
4	14	NS	11	4S-1	N	.	9	-50	310	-360	-8	-8	-8	Yes
4	15	NS	10	2H=	N	.	8	110	0	110	3	3	3
4	16	NS	10	4SX-1	N	.	9	-100	-150	50	2	2	2
4	17	NS	2	4H+2	E	.	12	-480	-620	140	4	4	3
4	18	NS	2	3H-1	W	.	8	50	-120	170	5	5	5
4	21	NS	19	3D+2	W	.	11	-150	-120	-30	-1	-1	-2
4	22	NS	19	4C-4	S	.	6	-200	-60	-140	-4	-4	-4
4	23	NS	18	4H=	E	.	10	-620	-230	-390	-9	-9	-8
4	24	NS	18	1S+1	S	.	8	110	110	0	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Jill Tattersfield & Lorna Wells

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
5	1	NS	19	3NT+1	N	.	10	430	580	-150	-4	-4	-4
5	2	NS	19	2S+2	S	.	10	170	40	130	4	4	3
5	3	NS	18	4S=	S	.	10	420	270	150	4	4	4
5	4	NS	18	3D=	E	.	9	-110	-100	-10	0	0	0
5	5	NS	17	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-2
5	6	NS	17	3S+1	N	.	10	170	100	70	2	2	3
5	7	EW	16	4S=	S	.	10	-620	-660	40	1	1	3
5	8	EW	16	4HX-2	E	.	8	-300	-100	-200	-5	-5	-6
5	9	NS	15	6NT-1	N	.	11	-50	460	-510	-11	-11	-11	Yes
5	10	NS	15	3D-1	W	.	8	100	10	90	3	3	3
5	11	NS	14	4H+1	W	.	11	-450	-290	-160	-4	-4	-4
5	12	NS	14	4S-1	W	.	9	50	10	40	1	1	1
5	13	NS	13	5S-1	S	.	10	-100	-20	-80	-2	-2	-2
5	14	NS	13	2S+2	N	.	10	170	310	-140	-4	-4	-3
5	15	NS	12	2S+1	N	.	9	140	0	140	4	4	4
5	16	NS	12	3H+1	E	.	10	-170	-150	-20	-1	-1	0
5	17	NS	11	3NT+3	E	.	12	-490	-620	130	4	4	2
5	18	NS	11	1H+2	W	.	9	-140	-120	-20	-1	-1	-1
5	19	NS	10	3NT=	S	.	9	400	300	100	3	3	3
5	20	NS	10	4S=	E	.	10	-620	50	-670	-12	-12	-12	Yes
5	21	NS	2	3D=	E	.	9	-110	-120	10	0	0	-1
5	22	NS	2	4H-4	N	.	6	-200	-60	-140	-4	-4	-4

Detail for Pair: Sheila Vincent & Nick Hagan

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
6	1	NS	2	3NT+1	N	.	10	430	580	-150	-4	-4	-4
6	2	NS	2	3NT-2	S	.	7	-200	40	-240	-6	-6	-7	Yes
6	5	NS	19	3S=	S	.	9	140	0	140	4	4	4
6	6	NS	19	3SX-2	N	.	7	-300	100	-400	-9	-9	-9	Yes
6	7	NS	18	4S=	S	.	10	620	660	-40	-1	-1	-3	Yes
6	8	NS	18	3H-2	E	.	7	100	100	0	0	0	0
6	9	EW	17	3NT+2	N	.	11	-460	-460	0	0	0	0
6	10	EW	17	2H=	S	.	8	-110	-10	-100	-3	-3	-3
6	11	NS	16	4H=	W	.	10	-420	-290	-130	-4	-4	-4
6	12	NS	16	3H-1	N	.	8	-100	10	-110	-3	-3	-3
6	13	NS	15	3NT+2	N	.	11	660	-20	680	12	12	12	Yes
6	14	NS	15	3S+1	N	.	10	170	310	-140	-4	-4	-3
6	15	NS	14	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-3	Yes
6	16	NS	14	3S-1	N	.	8	-50	-150	100	3	3	3
6	17	NS	13	4H+2	E	.	12	-480	-620	140	4	4	3
6	18	NS	13	1H+3	W	.	10	-170	-120	-50	-2	-2	-2	Yes
6	19	NS	12	3NT-4	S	.	5	-200	300	-500	-11	-11	-10	Yes
6	20	NS	12	5S-2	E	.	9	200	50	150	4	4	4
6	21	NS	11	3D=	E	.	9	-110	-120	10	0	0	-1
6	22	NS	11	4H-2	N	.	8	-100	-60	-40	-1	-1	-2
6	23	NS	10	3H+1	W	.	10	-170	-230	60	2	2	2
6	24	NS	10	2C+1	S	.	9	110	110	0	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Roger Bacon & Len Williams

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
7	1	NS	12	6D+1	N	.	13	940	580	360	8	8	8	Yes
7	2	NS	12	3S=	N	.	9	140	40	100	3	3	2
7	3	NS	11	4S=	S	.	10	420	270	150	4	4	4	Yes
7	4	NS	11	2NT-1	E	.	7	100	-100	200	5	5	6	Yes
7	5	NS	10	2S=	N	.	8	110	0	110	3	3	3
7	6	NS	10	3S+1	N	.	10	170	100	70	2	2	3
7	7	NS	2	4S+1	S	.	11	650	660	-10	0	0	-2
7	8	NS	2	4HX-2	E	.	8	300	100	200	5	5	6	Yes
7	11	NS	19	4H+2	W	.	12	-480	-290	-190	-5	-5	-6	Yes
7	12	NS	19	2H=	N	.	8	110	10	100	3	3	3	Yes
7	13	EW	18	6NT-1	N	.	11	100	20	80	2	2	2
7	14	EW	18	4S=	N	.	10	-420	-310	-110	-3	-3	-4
7	15	NS	17	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-3
7	16	NS	17	4H=	E	.	10	-620	-150	-470	-10	-10	-10	Yes
7	17	NS	16	6HX-1	E	.	11	100	-620	720	12	12	12	Yes
7	18	NS	16	1H+2	W	.	9	-140	-120	-20	-1	-1	-1
7	19	NS	15	3NT+2	S	.	11	460	300	160	4	4	5	Yes
7	20	NS	15	3NT+1	S	.	10	630	50	580	11	11	11	Yes
7	21	NS	14	3S-1	S	.	8	-100	-120	20	1	1	0
7	22	NS	14	4SX-3	E	.	7	800	-60	860	13	13	14	Yes
7	23	NS	13	3H+1	W	.	10	-170	-230	60	2	2	2
7	24	NS	13	2S+1	S	.	9	140	110	30	1	1	1

Detail for Pair: Catriona Lovett & Mike Harbour

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
8	1	NS	14	5D+1	N	.	12	420	580	-160	-4	-4	-4	Yes
8	2	NS	14	4S+1	S	.	11	650	40	610	12	12	12	Yes
8	3	NS	13	4S-1	S	.	9	-50	270	-320	-8	-8	-7
8	4	NS	13	2D=	E	.	8	-90	-100	10	0	0	0
8	5	NS	12	3S=	N	.	9	140	0	140	4	4	4	Yes
8	6	NS	12	2S+2	N	.	10	170	100	70	2	2	3
8	7	NS	11	4S+1	S	.	11	650	660	-10	0	0	-2
8	8	NS	11	4D-1	N	.	9	-50	100	-150	-4	-4	-4
8	9	NS	10	3NT+2	S	.	11	460	460	0	0	0	0
8	10	NS	10	4H-2	S	.	8	-200	10	-210	-5	-5	-5
8	11	NS	2	4C=	S	.	10	130	-290	420	9	9	9	Yes
8	12	NS	2	2H=	N	.	8	110	10	100	3	3	3
8	15	EW	19	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	3
8	16	EW	19	4H=	W	.	10	620	150	470	10	10	10
8	17	NS	18	6H=	E	.	12	-980	-620	-360	-8	-8	-8
8	18	NS	18	4H-1	W	.	9	50	-120	170	5	5	5	Yes
8	19	NS	17	3NT+1	S	.	10	430	300	130	4	4	4
8	20	NS	17	5D-1	N	.	10	-100	50	-150	-4	-4	-3
8	21	NS	16	3D+1	E	.	10	-130	-120	-10	0	0	-2
8	22	NS	16	4H-3	N	.	7	-150	-60	-90	-3	-3	-3
8	23	NS	15	3H-1	W	.	8	100	-230	330	8	8	8	Yes
8	24	NS	15	1NT-2	E	.	5	100	110	-10	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Margaret Rastin & Roger Tattersfield

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
9	1	NS	16	3NT+3	N	.	12	490	580	-90	-3	-3	-2
9	2	NS	16	1S+3	S	.	10	170	40	130	4	4	3
9	3	NS	15	4S-1	S	.	9	-50	270	-320	-8	-8	-7	Yes
9	4	NS	15	2D=	E	.	8	-90	-100	10	0	0	0
9	5	NS	14	3S=	N	.	9	140	0	140	4	4	4
9	6	NS	14	3S+1	N	.	10	170	100	70	2	2	3	Yes
9	7	NS	13	4S+2	N	.	12	680	660	20	1	1	-1
9	8	NS	13	4D-1	N	.	9	-50	100	-150	-4	-4	-4
9	9	NS	12	4NT+2	N	.	12	490	460	30	1	1	1
9	10	NS	12	2H-1	S	.	7	-100	10	-110	-3	-3	-3
9	11	NS	11	5CX-1	S	.	10	-100	-290	190	5	5	4
9	12	NS	11	4H-2	N	.	8	-200	10	-210	-5	-5	-5	Yes
9	13	NS	10	6NT-2	N	.	10	-200	-20	-180	-5	-5	-5
9	14	NS	10	4S=	S	.	10	420	310	110	3	3	4
9	15	NS	2	2S+2	N	.	10	170	0	170	5	5	5	Yes
9	16	NS	2	4S-2	N	.	8	-100	-150	50	2	2	2
9	19	NS	19	3NT=	S	.	9	400	300	100	3	3	3
9	20	NS	19	5DX-1	N	.	10	-200	50	-250	-6	-6	-5
9	21	NS	18	5DX-2	E	.	9	300	-120	420	9	9	10	Yes
9	22	NS	18	4HX-2	N	.	8	-300	-60	-240	-6	-6	-7	Yes
9	23	NS	17	3S-2	S	.	7	-200	-230	30	1	1	1
9	24	NS	17	1NT-2	E	.	5	100	110	-10	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Chris Megahey & Alaric Cundy

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
10	1	NS	13	6D=	N	.	12	920	580	340	8	8	8
10	2	NS	13	4S-1	S	.	9	-100	40	-140	-4	-4	-4
10	3	EW	1	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-270	-150	-4	-4	-4
10	4	EW	1	2D+1	E	.	9	110	100	10	0	0	0
10	5	EW	7	2S=	N	.	8	-110	0	-110	-3	-3	-3
10	6	EW	7	3S+1	N	.	10	-170	-100	-70	-2	-2	-3
10	7	EW	19	4H+2	N	.	12	-680	-660	-20	-1	-1	1
10	8	EW	19	3H-2	E	.	7	-100	-100	0	0	0	0
10	9	EW	8	3NT+2	S	.	11	-460	-460	0	0	0	0
10	10	EW	8	4H-2	S	.	8	200	-10	210	5	5	5
10	11	EW	3	5CX-1	S	.	10	100	290	-190	-5	-5	-4
10	12	EW	3	3S-2	W	.	7	-100	-10	-90	-3	-3	-3
10	13	EW	9	6NT-2	N	.	10	200	20	180	5	5	5
10	14	EW	9	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-310	-110	-3	-3	-4
10	15	EW	4	2H=	N	.	8	-110	0	-110	-3	-3	-3
10	16	EW	4	4SX-1	N	.	9	100	150	-50	-2	-2	-2
10	17	EW	12	6HX=	W	.	12	1210	620	590	11	11	11	Yes
10	18	EW	12	1H+3	W	.	10	170	120	50	2	2	2
10	19	EW	5	3NT=	S	.	9	-400	-300	-100	-3	-3	-3
10	20	EW	5	4S=	E	.	10	620	-50	670	12	12	12	Yes
10	23	EW	6	3H+1	W	.	10	170	230	-60	-2	-2	-2
10	24	EW	6	2C+1	S	.	9	-110	-110	0	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Phil Hitchins & Phil Tucker

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
11	1	EW	1	5D+1	N	.	12	-420	-580	160	4	4	4
11	2	EW	1	4H-2	S	.	8	200	-40	240	6	6	7
11	3	EW	7	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-270	-150	-4	-4	-4	Yes
11	4	EW	7	2NT-1	E	.	7	-100	100	-200	-5	-5	-6	Yes
11	7	EW	8	4S+1	S	.	11	-650	-660	10	0	0	2
11	8	EW	8	4D-1	N	.	9	50	-100	150	4	4	4
11	9	EW	3	3NT+3	N	.	12	-490	-460	-30	-1	-1	-1
11	10	EW	3	2H+1	S	.	9	-140	-10	-130	-4	-4	-4
11	11	EW	9	5CX-1	S	.	10	100	290	-190	-5	-5	-4
11	12	EW	9	4H-2	N	.	8	200	-10	210	5	5	5	Yes
11	13	EW	4	6NT-1	S	.	11	100	20	80	2	2	2
11	14	EW	4	4S-1	N	.	9	50	-310	360	8	8	8	Yes
11	15	EW	13	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	3
11	16	EW	13	3H=	E	.	9	140	150	-10	0	0	0
11	17	EW	5	3NT+3	E	.	12	490	620	-130	-4	-4	-2
11	18	EW	5	1H+2	W	.	9	140	120	20	1	1	1
11	19	NS	2	3NT=	S	.	9	400	300	100	3	3	3
11	20	NS	2	5D-1	N	.	10	-100	50	-150	-4	-4	-3
11	21	EW	6	3D=	E	.	9	110	120	-10	0	0	1
11	22	EW	6	4H-2	N	.	8	100	60	40	1	1	2
11	23	NS	14	4SX-4	S	.	6	-1100	-230	-870	-13	-13	-14	Yes
11	24	NS	14	2S-2	S	.	6	-100	110	-210	-5	-5	-6	Yes

Detail for Pair: Lionel Thacker & James Murray

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
12	1	EW	7	6D+1	N	.	13	-940	-580	-360	-8	-8	-8	Yes
12	2	EW	7	3S=	N	.	9	-140	-40	-100	-3	-3	-2
12	3	EW	2	4S-1	S	.	9	50	-270	320	8	8	7
12	4	EW	2	2NT-4	N	.	4	400	100	300	7	7	8	Yes
12	5	EW	8	3S=	N	.	9	-140	0	-140	-4	-4	-4	Yes
12	6	EW	8	2S+2	N	.	10	-170	-100	-70	-2	-2	-3
12	7	EW	3	4S+2	N	.	12	-680	-660	-20	-1	-1	1
12	8	EW	3	3C+1	S	.	10	-130	-100	-30	-1	-1	-1
12	9	EW	9	4NT+2	N	.	12	-490	-460	-30	-1	-1	-1
12	10	EW	9	2H-1	S	.	7	100	-10	110	3	3	3
12	11	EW	4	4H=	W	.	10	420	290	130	4	4	4
12	12	EW	4	4H-1	N	.	9	100	-10	110	3	3	3
12	13	EW	14	6NT-2	N	.	10	200	20	180	5	5	5	Yes
12	14	EW	14	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-310	-110	-3	-3	-4
12	15	EW	5	2S+1	N	.	9	-140	0	-140	-4	-4	-4
12	16	EW	5	3H+1	E	.	10	170	150	20	1	1	0
12	17	NS	10	6HX=	W	.	12	-1210	-620	-590	-11	-11	-11	Yes
12	18	NS	10	1H+3	W	.	10	-170	-120	-50	-2	-2	-2
12	19	EW	6	3NT-4	S	.	5	200	-300	500	11	11	10	Yes
12	20	EW	6	5S-2	E	.	9	-200	-50	-150	-4	-4	-4
12	21	NS	15	3D=	E	.	9	-110	-120	10	0	0	-1
12	22	NS	15	4H-3	N	.	7	-150	-60	-90	-3	-3	-3
12	23	NS	1	3H=	W	.	9	-140	-230	90	3	3	3
12	24	NS	1	3H=	N	.	9	140	110	30	1	1	1

Detail for Pair: Simon Moorman & Peter Oake

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
13	1	EW	10	6D=	N	.	12	-920	-580	-340	-8	-8	-8
13	2	EW	10	4S-1	S	.	9	100	-40	140	4	4	4
13	3	EW	8	4S-1	S	.	9	50	-270	320	8	8	7
13	4	EW	8	2D=	E	.	8	90	100	-10	0	0	0
13	5	EW	3	3S-1	S	.	8	100	0	100	3	3	2
13	6	EW	3	1NT=	W	.	7	90	-100	190	5	5	4
13	7	EW	9	4S+2	N	.	12	-680	-660	-20	-1	-1	1
13	8	EW	9	4D-1	N	.	9	50	-100	150	4	4	4
13	9	EW	4	3NT+2	N	.	11	-460	-460	0	0	0	0
13	10	EW	4	4H-2	S	.	8	200	-10	210	5	5	5	Yes
13	11	EW	15	5H=	W	.	11	450	290	160	4	4	4
13	12	EW	15	2D-2	W	.	6	-100	-10	-90	-3	-3	-3
13	13	EW	5	5S-1	S	.	10	100	20	80	2	2	2
13	14	EW	5	2S+2	N	.	10	-170	-310	140	4	4	3
13	15	NS	11	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-3
13	16	NS	11	3H=	E	.	9	-140	-150	10	0	0	0
13	17	EW	6	4H+2	E	.	12	480	620	-140	-4	-4	-3
13	18	EW	6	1H+3	W	.	10	170	120	50	2	2	2	Yes
13	19	NS	16	3NT+1	S	.	10	430	300	130	4	4	4
13	20	NS	16	3NT=	S	.	9	600	50	550	11	11	10
13	21	NS	1	3D+1	E	.	10	-130	-120	-10	0	0	-2
13	22	NS	1	3S-1	E	.	8	100	-60	160	4	4	3
13	23	EW	7	3H+1	W	.	10	170	230	-60	-2	-2	-2
13	24	EW	7	2S+1	S	.	9	-140	-110	-30	-1	-1	-1

Detail for Pair: Les Curtis & David Piper

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
14	1	EW	8	5D+1	N	.	12	-420	-580	160	4	4	4	Yes
14	2	EW	8	4S+1	S	.	11	-650	-40	-610	-12	-12	-12	Yes
14	3	NS	3	4S=	S	.	10	420	270	150	4	4	4
14	4	NS	3	2D=	E	.	8	-90	-100	10	0	0	0
14	5	EW	9	3S=	N	.	9	-140	0	-140	-4	-4	-4
14	6	EW	9	3S+1	N	.	10	-170	-100	-70	-2	-2	-3	Yes
14	7	EW	4	6S=	S	.	12	-1430	-660	-770	-13	-13	-13	Yes
14	8	EW	4	5D-3	N	.	8	150	-100	250	6	6	6	Yes
14	9	EW	16	3NT+1	N	.	10	-430	-460	30	1	1	1
14	10	EW	16	3D-1	W	.	8	-100	-10	-90	-3	-3	-3
14	11	EW	5	4H+1	W	.	11	450	290	160	4	4	4
14	12	EW	5	4S-1	W	.	9	-50	-10	-40	-1	-1	-1
14	13	NS	12	6NT-2	N	.	10	-200	-20	-180	-5	-5	-5	Yes
14	14	NS	12	4S=	S	.	10	420	310	110	3	3	4
14	15	EW	6	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	3	Yes
14	16	EW	6	3S-1	N	.	8	50	150	-100	-3	-3	-3
14	17	NS	17	4S=	W	.	10	-420	-620	200	5	5	4
14	18	NS	17	3H=	W	.	9	-140	-120	-20	-1	-1	-1
14	19	EW	1	3C=	S	.	9	-110	-300	190	5	5	4
14	20	EW	1	3S+1	E	.	10	170	-50	220	6	6	4
14	21	EW	7	3S-1	S	.	8	100	120	-20	-1	-1	0
14	22	EW	7	4SX-3	E	.	7	-800	60	-860	-13	-13	-14	Yes
14	23	EW	11	4SX-4	S	.	6	1100	230	870	13	13	14	Yes
14	24	EW	11	2S-2	S	.	6	100	-110	210	5	5	6	Yes

Detail for Pair: Pamela Kite & Liz Williams

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
15	1	NS	3	6D=	N	.	12	920	580	340	8	8	8
15	2	NS	3	2S+2	S	.	10	170	40	130	4	4	3
15	3	EW	9	4S-1	S	.	9	50	-270	320	8	8	7	Yes
15	4	EW	9	2D=	E	.	8	90	100	-10	0	0	0
15	5	NS	4	4S-2	N	.	8	-200	0	-200	-5	-5	-5	Yes
15	6	NS	4	3S-1	N	.	8	-50	100	-150	-4	-4	-4
15	7	EW	17	4S+1	S	.	11	-650	-660	10	0	0	2
15	8	EW	17	3H-3	E	.	6	-150	-100	-50	-2	-2	-2
15	9	EW	5	6NT-1	N	.	11	50	-460	510	11	11	11	Yes
15	10	EW	5	3D-1	W	.	8	-100	-10	-90	-3	-3	-3
15	11	NS	13	5H=	W	.	11	-450	-290	-160	-4	-4	-4
15	12	NS	13	2D-2	W	.	6	100	10	90	3	3	3
15	13	EW	6	3NT+2	N	.	11	-660	20	-680	-12	-12	-12	Yes
15	14	EW	6	3S+1	N	.	10	-170	-310	140	4	4	3
15	15	NS	18	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-3
15	16	NS	18	3S=	N	.	9	140	-150	290	7	7	7	Yes
15	17	EW	1	6H=	E	.	12	980	620	360	8	8	8
15	18	EW	1	2H+1	W	.	9	140	120	20	1	1	1
15	19	EW	7	3NT+2	S	.	11	-460	-300	-160	-4	-4	-5	Yes
15	20	EW	7	3NT+1	S	.	10	-630	-50	-580	-11	-11	-11	Yes
15	21	EW	12	3D=	E	.	9	110	120	-10	0	0	1
15	22	EW	12	4H-3	N	.	7	150	60	90	3	3	3
15	23	EW	8	3H-1	W	.	8	-100	230	-330	-8	-8	-8	Yes
15	24	EW	8	1NT-2	E	.	5	-100	-110	10	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Julie Lake & Gillian Burrows

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
16	1	EW	9	3NT+3	N	.	12	-490	-580	90	3	3	2
16	2	EW	9	1S+3	S	.	10	-170	-40	-130	-4	-4	-3
16	3	NS	4	4D-3	E	.	7	300	270	30	1	1	1
16	4	NS	4	2D=	E	.	8	-90	-100	10	0	0	0
16	5	EW	18	4S-1	S	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	2
16	6	EW	18	3S+1	N	.	10	-170	-100	-70	-2	-2	-3
16	7	NS	5	4S=	S	.	10	620	660	-40	-1	-1	-3
16	8	NS	5	4HX-2	E	.	8	300	100	200	5	5	6
16	9	NS	14	3NT+1	N	.	10	430	460	-30	-1	-1	-1
16	10	NS	14	3D-1	W	.	8	100	10	90	3	3	3
16	11	EW	6	4H=	W	.	10	420	290	130	4	4	4
16	12	EW	6	3H-1	N	.	8	100	-10	110	3	3	3
16	13	NS	19	4NT=	N	.	10	630	-20	650	12	12	11
16	14	NS	19	3S=	S	.	9	140	310	-170	-5	-5	-4
16	15	EW	1	3S=	N	.	9	-140	0	-140	-4	-4	-4
16	16	EW	1	3H-1	E	.	8	-100	150	-250	-6	-6	-6
16	17	EW	7	6HX-1	E	.	11	-100	620	-720	-12	-12	-12	Yes
16	18	EW	7	1H+2	W	.	9	140	120	20	1	1	1
16	19	EW	13	3NT+1	S	.	10	-430	-300	-130	-4	-4	-4
16	20	EW	13	3NT=	S	.	9	-600	-50	-550	-11	-11	-10
16	21	EW	8	3D+1	E	.	10	130	120	10	0	0	2
16	22	EW	8	4H-3	N	.	7	150	60	90	3	3	3
16	23	EW	3	3H=	W	.	9	140	230	-90	-3	-3	-3
16	24	EW	3	1NT-2	E	.	5	-100	-110	10	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Dorothy Cundy & Chris Rastin

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
17	1	EW	4	3NT+1	N	.	10	-430	-580	150	4	4	4
17	2	EW	4	4S-1	S	.	9	100	-40	140	4	4	4
17	3	EW	19	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-270	-150	-4	-4	-4
17	4	EW	19	2NT-1	N	.	7	100	100	0	0	0	0
17	5	EW	5	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	2
17	6	EW	5	3S+1	N	.	10	-170	-100	-70	-2	-2	-3
17	7	NS	15	4S+1	S	.	11	650	660	-10	0	0	-2
17	8	NS	15	3H-3	E	.	6	150	100	50	2	2	2
17	9	NS	6	3NT+2	N	.	11	460	460	0	0	0	0
17	10	NS	6	2H=	S	.	8	110	10	100	3	3	3
17	13	EW	1	6NT-1	N	.	11	100	20	80	2	2	2
17	14	EW	1	4S=	N	.	10	-420	-310	-110	-3	-3	-4
17	15	EW	7	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	3
17	16	EW	7	4H=	E	.	10	620	150	470	10	10	10	Yes
17	17	EW	14	4S=	W	.	10	420	620	-200	-5	-5	-4
17	18	EW	14	3H=	W	.	9	140	120	20	1	1	1
17	19	EW	8	3NT+1	S	.	10	-430	-300	-130	-4	-4	-4
17	20	EW	8	5D-1	N	.	10	100	-50	150	4	4	3
17	21	EW	3	3D+2	W	.	11	150	120	30	1	1	2	Yes
17	22	EW	3	4S-3	E	.	7	-300	60	-360	-8	-8	-7
17	23	EW	9	3S-2	S	.	7	200	230	-30	-1	-1	-1
17	24	EW	9	1NT-2	E	.	5	-100	-110	10	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: David Tennet & Theo Todman

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
18	3	EW	5	4S=	S	.	10	-420	-270	-150	-4	-4	-4
18	4	EW	5	3D=	E	.	9	110	100	10	0	0	0
18	5	NS	16	4S-1	S	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-2
18	6	NS	16	3S+1	N	.	10	170	100	70	2	2	3
18	7	EW	6	4S=	S	.	10	-620	-660	40	1	1	3	Yes
18	8	EW	6	3H-2	E	.	7	-100	-100	0	0	0	0
18	9	NS	2	3NT+2	S	.	11	460	460	0	0	0	0
18	10	NS	2	2H+1	N	.	9	140	10	130	4	4	4	Yes
18	11	EW	1	5CX-1	S	.	10	100	290	-190	-5	-5	-4
18	12	EW	1	3C-1	S	.	8	100	-10	110	3	3	3
18	13	NS	7	6NT-1	N	.	11	-100	-20	-80	-2	-2	-2
18	14	NS	7	4S=	N	.	10	420	310	110	3	3	4
18	15	EW	15	4S-1	N	.	9	100	0	100	3	3	3
18	16	EW	15	3S=	N	.	9	-140	150	-290	-7	-7	-7	Yes
18	17	EW	8	6H=	E	.	12	980	620	360	8	8	8
18	18	EW	8	4H-1	W	.	9	-50	120	-170	-5	-5	-5	Yes
18	19	EW	3	5C-1	S	.	10	50	-300	350	8	8	8
18	20	EW	3	4D=	N	.	10	-130	-50	-80	-2	-2	-2
18	21	EW	9	5DX-2	E	.	9	-300	120	-420	-9	-9	-10	Yes
18	22	EW	9	4HX-2	N	.	8	300	60	240	6	6	7	Yes
18	23	EW	4	4H=	E	.	10	620	230	390	9	9	8
18	24	EW	4	1S+1	S	.	8	-110	-110	0	0	0	0

Detail for Pair: Derek Smith & Peter Goodey

Pair	Board	Sat	Opponents	Contract	By	Lead	Tricks	Score	Datum	Butler Score	Butler IMPs	Scored IMPs	X-IMPs	Outlier?
19	1	EW	5	3NT+1	N	.	10	-430	-580	150	4	4	4
19	2	EW	5	2S+2	S	.	10	-170	-40	-130	-4	-4	-3
19	3	NS	17	4S=	S	.	10	420	270	150	4	4	4
19	4	NS	17	2NT-1	N	.	7	-100	-100	0	0	0	0
19	5	EW	6	3S=	S	.	9	-140	0	-140	-4	-4	-4
19	6	EW	6	3SX-2	N	.	7	300	-100	400	9	9	9	Yes
19	7	NS	10	4H+2	N	.	12	680	660	20	1	1	-1
19	8	NS	10	3H-2	E	.	7	100	100	0	0	0	0
19	9	EW	1	6NT=	N	.	12	-990	-460	-530	-11	-11	-11	Yes
19	10	EW	1	2H-1	S	.	7	100	-10	110	3	3	3
19	11	EW	7	4H+2	W	.	12	480	290	190	5	5	6	Yes
19	12	EW	7	2H=	N	.	8	-110	-10	-100	-3	-3	-3	Yes
19	13	EW	16	4NT=	N	.	10	-630	20	-650	-12	-12	-11
19	14	EW	16	3S=	S	.	9	-140	-310	170	5	5	4
19	15	NS	8	4S-1	N	.	9	-100	0	-100	-3	-3	-3
19	16	NS	8	4H=	W	.	10	-620	-150	-470	-10	-10	-10
19	17	EW	3	4H+2	E	.	12	480	620	-140	-4	-4	-3
19	18	EW	3	2H+2	W	.	10	170	120	50	2	2	2
19	19	EW	9	3NT=	S	.	9	-400	-300	-100	-3	-3	-3
19	20	EW	9	5DX-1	N	.	10	200	-50	250	6	6	5
19	21	EW	4	3D+2	W	.	11	150	120	30	1	1	2
19	22	EW	4	4C-4	S	.	6	200	60	140	4	4	4
19	23	EW	2	3H+1	W	.	10	170	230	-60	-2	-2	-2
19	24	EW	2	2H+3	N	.	11	-200	-110	-90	-3	-3	-3	Yes

File output at 21/04/2015 19:07:00 by Theo Todman