The Metaphysics of Irreducibility
Pereboom (Derek) & Kornblith (Hilary)
Source: Philosophical Studies, Vol. 63, No. 2 (Aug., 1991), pp. 125-145
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperNotes Citing this PaperText Colour-ConventionsDisclaimer


Authors’ Abstract

  1. During the 'sixties and 'seventies, Hilary Putnam, Jerry Fodor, and Richard Boyd, among others, developed a type of materialism that eschews reductionist claims.
  2. In this view, explanations, natural kinds, and properties in psychology do not reduce to counterparts in more basic sciences, such as neurophysiology or physics. Nevertheless, all token psychological entities - states, processes, and faculties - are wholly constituted of physical entities, ultimately out of entities over which microphysics quantifies.
  3. This view soon became the standard position in philosophy of mind, and reductionism fell out of favor. Recently, however, reductionism has been experiencing a rebirth, and many have suggested that the non-reductive approach was accepted too quickly and too uncritically.
  4. In this paper, we attempt to provide a more thorough account of the anti-reductionist position, and, in the process, to defend it against its recent criticism.

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - June 2026. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page