Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?
Yablo (Stephen)
Source: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, Vol. 72 (1998), pp. 229-261
Paper - Abstract

Paper StatisticsBooks / Papers Citing this PaperDisclaimer


Author’s Abstract

  1. The usual charge against Carnap's internal / external distinction is one of 'guilt by association with analytic / synthetic'.
  2. But it can be freed of this association, to become the distinction between statements made within make-believe games and those made outside them – or, rather, a special case of it with some claim to be called the metaphorical / literal distinction.
  3. Not even Quine considers figurative speech committal, so this turns the tables somewhat.
  4. To determine our ontological commitments, we have to ferret out all traces of non-literality in our assertions; if there is no sensible project of doing that, there is no sensible project of Quinean ontology.

Comment:

Symposium with "Gallois (Andre) - Does Ontology Rest on a Mistake?".

Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)

  1. Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2019
  2. Mauve: Text by correspondent(s) or other author(s); © the author(s)



© Theo Todman, June 2007 - Dec 2019. Please address any comments on this page to theo@theotodman.com. File output:
Website Maintenance Dashboard
Return to Top of this Page Return to Theo Todman's Philosophy Page Return to Theo Todman's Home Page