Write-up1 (as at 06/07/2023 00:43:12): Biological Criterion
Plug Note2
- Thesis Text:
- Biological Criteria are the criteria of identity3 associated with the biological view4 of what we5 human beings6 are.
- Animalism7 takes this biological view, that we are human animals8 (as distinct from persons9, or immaterial souls10). So, our persistence criteria are those of animals11.
- What should be discussed here is just what these criteria are.
- Biological identity criteria in general are slightly wider than those of animals in particular, as they include those for plants12 and other biological organisms13.
- Locke14 made the first stab at what this criterion might be. His view was that it was the participation in a single life15 that made an organism16 the same organism over time. The concept of a life is itself in need of explanation, and may not (in the absence of vitalism) be logically prior to the concept of an organism.
- It seems to me that the biological criterion could (theoretically, at least) allow for metamorphosis17 (provided that the metamorphosis18 is into another organism). There are, however, sortal19 objections to metamorphosis20.
- The jumping-off point for this topic is probably "Wilson (Jack) - Biological Individuality - The identity and Persistence of Living Entities". However, the book is at pains to point out that the persistence criteria for exemplars of particular species – and, indeed, their principles of individuation – differ greatly. Standard views are overly influenced by the assumption that all biological individuals are like large mammals rather than, say, strawberry plants21. However, as we are large mammals, I’m not too worried about this fine point.
- Note that the biological criterion is to be distinguished from the body criterion22, with which the psychological criterion23 was originally contrasted.
Further Remarks
- The categorised reading-lists below are of little use and in need of further research. It is somewhat arbitrary as to which books / papers fall under this topic, and which under
References
- Relevant Works cited above:
- "Wilson (Jack) - Biological Individuality - The identity and Persistence of Living Entities", 1999, Book, Read
- For a page of Links26 to this Note, Click here.
- Works on this topic that I’ve actually read27, include the following:-
- General:
- "Corcoran (Kevin) - Biology or Psychology? Human Persons and Personal Identity", 2003, Annotations
- "DeGrazia (David) - Are we essentially persons? Olson, Baker, and a reply", 2002, Write-Up Note28, Annotations, Internal PDF Link, Footnote29
- "Lerner (Berel Dov) - Review of 'Personal Identity and Ethics: A Brief Introduction' by David Shoemaker", 2009
- "Olson (Eric) - The Biological Approach", 1999
- "Shoemaker (David) - Personal Identity and Ethics", 2005-12, Annotations, External Link, Internal PDF Link
- "Shoemaker (David) - Personal Identity and Ethics: A Brief Introduction", 2009, Book, Footnote30
- "Wilson (Jack) - Biological Individuality - The identity and Persistence of Living Entities", 1999, Book
- "Wrangham (Richard) - Review of 'The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit' by Melvin Konner", 2004, External Link, Internal PDF Link
- A further reading list might start with:-
- For a list of Works that have been considered, but have missed the cut for inclusion in this Section of my Thesis, see the following:-
- Read: No items to list.
- Further Reading: No items to list.
- This is mostly a place-holder31.
In-Page Footnotes
Footnote 1:
- This is the write-up as it was when this Abstract was last output, with text as at the timestamp indicated (06/07/2023 00:43:12).
- Link to Latest Write-Up Note.
Footnote 29: Footnote 30:
Text Colour Conventions (see disclaimer)
- Blue: Text by me; © Theo Todman, 2026